Don’t count your eggs before they hatch: differential survival of artificial bird nests in an anthropogenically modified landscape in western Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2024.95.5381Keywords:
Croplands, Bird nest predation, Habitat quality, Jalisco, Plasticine eggs, Tropical dry forest, UrbanizationAbstract
Native habitat conversion to urban and agricultural areas represents conservation concerns for habitat quality and
the breeding success of birds. In tropical areas facing regular deforestation of at-risk habitats, changes may occur to bird and nest predator communities that influence contradictory trends in breeding success. To assess the value of working lands for birds, we placed 100 artificial nests in 5 habitat types of varying human footprint, including a tropical dry forest reserve, a biological research station, croplands, and 2 urban towns. We report a clear decline in survival from the forest to urban towns. Habitat type explained the variation in nest survival probabilities over nest height, elevation, or time of nest exposure. Reducing the structural and compositional contrast of habitat and landscape vegetation between
tropical dry forest and working lands represent valuable conservation actions for increasing habitat quality for birds.
References
Aronson, M. F. J., La Sorte, F. A., Nilon, C. H., Katti, M., Goddard, M. A., Lepczyk, C. A. et al. (2014). A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20133330. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3330
Bayne, E. M., & Hobson, K. A. (1999). Do clay eggs attract predators to artificial nests? Journal of Field Ornithology, 70, 1–7.
Bayne, E. M., Hobson, K. A., & Fargey, P. (1997). Predation on artificial nests in relation to forest type: contrasting the use of quail and plasticine eggs. Ecography, 20, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00366.x
Bocz, R., Szép, D., Witz, D., Ronczyk, L., Kurucz, K., & Purger, J. J. (2017). Human disturbances and predation on artificial ground nests across an urban gradient. Animal Biodiversity Conservation, 40, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2017.40.0153
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Chace, J. F., & Walsh, J. J. (2006). Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74, 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007
Chalfoun, A. D., Thompson, F. R., & Ratnaswamy, M. J. (2002). Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis. Conservation Biology, 16, 306–318.
DeGregorio, B. A., Chiavacci, S. J., Benson, T. J., Sperry, J. H., & Weatherhead, P. J. (2016). Nest predators of North American birds: continental patterns and implications. Bioscience, 66, 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw071
Dinsmore, S. J., & Dinsmore, J. J., 2007. Modeling avian nest survival in program MARK. Studies in Avian Biology, 34, 73–83.
Durán, E., Balvanera, P., Lott, E., Segura, G., Pérez-Jiménez, A., Islas, Á. et al. (2002). Estructura, composición y dinámica de la vegetación. In F. A. Noguera, J. H. Vega-Rivera, A. N. García-Aldrete, & M. Quesada-Avendaño (Eds.), Historia natural de Chamela (pp. 443–472). México D.F.: Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., & Chaudhary, A. (2020). Current and future trends in socio-economic, demographic and governance factors affecting global primate conservation. PeerJ, 8, e9816. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9816
Estrada, A., Rivera, A., & Coates-Estrada, R. (2002). Predation of artificial nests in a fragmented landscape in the tropical region of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biological Conservation, 106, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00246-4
Filloy, J., Zurita, G. A., & Bellocq, M. I. (2019). Bird diversity in urban ecosystems: the role of the biome and land use along urbanization gradients. Ecosystems, 22, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-018-0264-y
Fischer, J. D., Cleeton, S. H., Lyons, T. P., & Miller, J. R. (2012). Urbanization and the predation paradox: the role of trophic dynamics in structuring vertebrate communities. Bioscience, 62, 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.6
Fischer, J. D., Schneider, S. C., Ahlers, A. A., & Miller, J. R. (2015). Categorizing wildlife responses to urbanization and conservation implications of terminology. Conservation Biology, 29, 1246–1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12451
Hurvich, C. M., & Tsai, C. L. (1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76, 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/76.2.297
INEGI (Información Estadística y Geográfica). (2020). Censo de población y vivienda 2020. Recovered on 12 May 2021 from: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2020/
Kehoe, L., Romero-Muñoz, A., Polaina, E., Estes, L., Kreft, H., & Kuemmerle, T. (2017). Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1, 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0234-3
Kurucz, K., Purger, J. J., & Batáry, P. (2021). Urbanization shapes bird communities and nest survival, but not their food quantity. Global Ecology and Evolution, 26, e01475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01475
Latif, Q. S., Heath, S. K., & Rotenberry, J. T. (2012). How avian nest site selection responds to predation risk: testing an ‘adaptive peak hypothesis’. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01895.x
Levey, D. R., Estrada, A., Enríquez, P. L., & Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G. (2021). The importance of forest-nonforest transition zones for avian conservation in a vegetation disturbance gradient in the northern Neotropics. Tropical Conservation Science, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/19400829211008087
Levey, D. R., & MacGregor-Fors, I. (2021). Neotropical bird communities in a human-modified landscape recently affected by two major hurricanes. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 16, art9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01920-160209
Levey, D. R., Patten, M. A., & Estrada, A. (2023). Bird species occupancy trends in southeast Mexico over 1900–2020: accounting for sighting record absences. Journal of Animal Ecology, 92, 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13871
López-Flores, V., MacGregor-Fors, I., & Schondube, J. E. (2009). Artificial nest predation along a Neotropical urban gradient. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.03.001
Maas, B., Karp, D. S., Bumrungsri, S., Darras, K., Gonthier, D., Huang, J. C. C. et al. (2016). Bird and bat predation services in tropical forests and agroforestry landscapes. Biological Reviews, 91, 1081–1101. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/brv.12211
Maass, J. M., Balvanera, P., Castillo, A., Daily, G. C., Mooney, H. A., Ehrlich, P. et al., (2005). Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific coast of Mexico. Ecology and Society, 10, art17.
MacGregor-Fors, I. (2010). How to measure the urban-wildland ecotone: redefining ‘peri-urban’ areas. Ecological Research, 25, 883–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-010-0717-z
MacGregor-Fors, I., García-Arroyo, M., & Quesada, J. (2022). Keys to the city: an integrative conceptual framework on avian urban filtering. Journal of Urban Ecology, 8, juac026. https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juac026
MacGregor-Fors, I., & Schondube, J. E. (2011). Use of tropical dry forests and agricultural areas by Neotropical bird communities. Biotropica, 43, 365–370. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00709.x
MacGregor-Fors, I., Vázquez, L., Vega-Rivera, J. H., & Schondube, J. E. (2009). Non-exotic invasion of Great-tailed Grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus) in a tropical dry forest reserve. Aredea, 97, 367–369. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.097.0312
Martin, T. E. (1993). Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. American Naturalist, 141, 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1086/285515
Martin, T. E. (1995). Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecological Monographs, 65, 101–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937160
Mendoza-Rodríguez, V., Vega-Rivera, J. H., Medina-Montaño, I., & Campos-Cerda, F. (2010). Response of birds in tropical deciduous forest to Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater). The Southwestern Naturalist, 55, 390–393. https://doi.org/10.1894/MH-46.1
Menezes, J. C. T., & Marini, M. Â. (2017). Predators of bird nests in the Neotropics: a review. Journal of Field Ornithology, 88, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12203
Patterson, L., Kalle, R., & Downs, C. (2016). Predation of artificial bird nests in suburban gardens of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Urban Ecosystems, 19, 615–630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0526-4
Pretelli, M. G., Cavalli, M., Chiaradia, N. M., Cardoni, A., & Isacch, J. P. (2023). Location matters: survival of artificial nests is higher in small grassland patches and near the patch edge. Ibis, 165, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13128
Rivera-López, A., & MacGregor-Fors, I. (2016). Urban predation: a case study assessing artificial nest survival in a Neotropical city. Urban Ecosystems, 19, 649–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0523-z
Robinson, W. D., Styrsky, J. N., & Brawn, J. D. (2005). Are artificial bird nests effective surrogates for estimating predation on real bird nests? A test with tropical birds. Auk, 122, 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/122.3.843
Rzedowski, J. (2006). Vegetación de México. Edicion digital. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. México, Ciudad de México. https://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/publicaciones/librosDig/pdf/VegetacionMxPort.pdf
Suazo‐Ortuño, I., Alvarado-Díaz, M., & Martínez-Ramos, M. (2008). Effects of conversion of dry tropical forest to agricultural mosaic on herpetofaunal assemblages. Conservation Biology, 22, 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00883.x
Shochat, E., Lerman, S. B., Anderies, J. M., Warren, P. S., Faeth, S. H., & Nilon, C. H. (2010). Invasion, competition, and biodiversity loss in urban ecosystems. Bioscience, 60, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6
Tellería, J. L., & Díaz, M. (1995). Avian nest predation in a large natural gap of the Amazonian rainforest. Journal of Field Ornithology, 66, 343–351.
Thorington, K. K., & Bowman, R. (2003). Predation rate on artificial nests increases with human housing density in suburban habitats. Ecography, 26, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03351.x
Vázquez-Reyes, L. D., Arizmendi, M. C., Godínez-Álvarez, O. H., & Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G. (2017). Directional effects of biotic homogenization of bird communities in Mexican seasonal forests. Ornithological Applications, 119, 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-16-116.1
Vazquez, M. S., Zamora-Nasca, L. B., Rodríguez-Cabal, M. A., & Amico, G. C., 2021. Interactive effects of habitat attributes and predator identity explain avian nest predation patterns. Emu - Austral Ornithology, 121, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01584197.2021.1928519
Vega-Rivera, J. H., Medina-Montaño, I., Rappole, J. & Campos-Cerda, F. (2009). Testing the importance of nest concealment: does timing matter? Journal of Field Ornithology, 80, 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2009.00234.x
Vetter, D., Rücker, G., & Storch, I. (2013). A meta-analysis of tropical forest edge effects on bird nest predation risk: edge effects in avian nest predation. Biological Conservation, 159, 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.023
Vincze, E., Seress, G., Lagisz, M., Nakagawa, S., Dingemanse, N. J., & Sprau, P. (2017). Does urbanization affect predation of bird nests? a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00029
White, G. C., & Burnham, K. P. (1999). Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study, 46 (Suppl.), S120–S139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659909477239
Zuñiga-Palacios, J., Corcuera, P., & Almazán-Núñez, R. C. (2021). Living fences decrease the edge effect on nest predation in a tropical dry forest landscape: evidence from an experiment using artificial nests. Agroforestry Systems, 95, 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00603-z
