Community structure of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in an open habitat: the importance of environmental heterogeneity and interspecific interactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2022.93.3900Palabras clave:
Diversidad de hormigas, Organización de la comunidad, Heterogeneidad del hábitat, Coexistencia de especies, Estructura de la vegetaciónResumen
Ant species are highly sensitive to environmental changes, and ant community structure can be shaped by environmental heterogeneity and interspecific interactions. We tested 2 hypotheses: (1) vegetation structure negatively affecting ant diversity in simplified habitats and (2) interspecific interactions shaping ant communities. We collected ants on shrubs distributed in 16 sampling units of 100 m2 using the entomological umbrella and beating technique in a regenerating Cerrado area of Brazil. The richness, abundance and average height of the plants were used as a measure of environmental heterogeneity. A total of 457 ants belonging to 17 species were sampled. We observed higher ant species richness in plots with greater plant abundance and lower plant height. We observed a negative relationship between ant abundance and plant height per plot. These results corroborate that vegetation structure negatively affects ant diversity in simplified habitats. The observed values of co-occurrence index differed from the expected values of simulated matrices, suggesting that competition shaping ant community in simplified habitats. We highlight the importance of conserving small trees, especially in structurally less complex habitats, because they represent key elements that harbor high ant species diversity.
Citas
Bartón, K. (2015). MuMIn: Multi - Model Inference. R Package Ver. 1.15.1. URL: http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=MuMIn
Castro, F. S., Silva, P. G., Solar, R., Fernandes G. W., & Neves, F. S. (2020). Environmental drivers of taxonomic and functional diversity of ant communities in a tropical mountain. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 13, 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12415
Chen, X., Adams, B., Sabo, A., Crupi, T., & Hooper-Bùi, L. (2016). Ant assemblages and co-occurrence patterns in Cypress-Tupelo Swamp. Wetlands, 36, 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0795-y
Colli, G. R., Vieira, C. R., & Dianese, J. C. (2020). Biodiversity and Conservation of the Cerrado: recent advances and old challenges. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29, 1465–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01967-x
Costa, F. V., Mello, R., Lana, T. C., & Neves, F. S. (2015). Ant fauna in megadiverse mountains: a checklist for the Rocky Grasslands. Sociobiology, 62, 228–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v62i2.228-245
Davidson, D., Cook, W. S. C., Snelling, R. R., & Chua, T. H. (2003). Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science, 300, 969–972. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082074
Dyer, L. A., & Letourneau, D. K. (1999). Relative strengths of top down and bottom up forces in a tropical forest community. Oecologia, 119, 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050785
Fagundes, M., Barbosa, E. M., Oliveira, J. B. B. S., Brito, B. G. S., Freitas, K. T., & Reis-Junior, R. (2019). Galling inducing insects associated with a tropical invasive shrub: the role of resource concentration and species interactions. Ecología Austral, 29, 12–19.
Fagundes, M., Cuevas-Reyes, P., Leite, L. F. R., Borges, M. A. Z., Araújo, W. S., Fernandes, G. W. et al. (2020). Diversity of gall-inducing insects associated with a widely distributed tropical tree species: testing the environmental stress hypothesis. Environmental Entomology, 49, 838–847. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvaa072
Fagundes, M., Neves, F. S., & Fernandes, G. W. (2005). Direct and indirect interactions involving ants, insects herbivores, parasitoids and the host plant Baccharis dracunculifolia (Asteraceae). Ecological Entomology, 30, 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00668.x
Fagundes, M., Santos, D. L., Mota, G. R., Salvador, H. F., Kuchenbecker, J., Capuchinho, L. M. N. et al. (2020). Ant community organization in two contrasting habitats: the roles of vegetation traits and species interactions. Entomological News, 129, 472–485. https://doi.org/10.3157/021.129.0502.
Floren, A., Freking, A., Biehl, M., & Linsenmair, K. E. (2001). Anthropogenic disturbance changes the structure of arboreal tropical ant communities. Ecography, 24, 547–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2001.tb00489.x
Fonseca, C. R., & Benson, W. W. (2003). Ontogenetic succession in Amazonian ant trees. Oikos, 102, 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.12021.x
Gotelli, N. J., Entsminger, G. L. (2001). EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Version 6.0. Acquired Intelligence and Kesey-Bear, Jericho, Vermont, USA. http://homepages.together.net
Kuchenbecker, J., & Fagundes, M. (2018). Diversity of insects associated with two common plants of the Brazilian Cerrado: responses of two guilds of herbivores to bottom-up and top-down forces. European Journal of Entomology, 115, 354–363. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2018.035
Lassau, S. A., & Hochuli, D. F. (2004). Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography, 27, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03675.xa
Lopes, C. T., & Vasconcelos, H. L. (2008). Evaluation of three methods for sampling ground-dwelling ants in the Brazilian cerrado. Neotropical Entomology, 37, 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2008000400007
Lopes, J. F. S., Hallack, N. M. R., Sales, T. A., Brugger, M. S., Ribeiro, L. F., Hastenreiter, I. N. et al. (2012). Comparison of the ant assemblages int hreePhytophysionomies: Rocky field, secondary forest, and riparian forest – a case study in the state park of Ibitipoca, Brazil. Psyche, 2012, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/928371
Mezger, D., & Pfeiffer, M. (2011). Partitioning the impact of abiotic factors and spatial patterns on species richness and community structure of ground ant assemblages in four Bornean rainforests. Ecography, 34, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06538.x
Neves, F. S., Braga, R. F., Araújo, L. S., Campos, R. I., & Fagundes, M. (2012). Differential effects of land use on ant and herbivore insect communities associated with Caryocar brasiliense (Caryocaraceae). Revista de Biología Tropical, 60, 1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.15517/RBT.V60I3.1758
Neves, F. S., Queiroz-Dantas, K. S., Rocha, W. D., & Delabie, J. H. C. (2013). Ants of three adjacent habitats of a transition region between the Cerrado and Caatinga biomes: the effects of heterogeneity and variation in canopy cover. Neotropical Entomology, 42, 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-013-0123-7
Oliveira-Filho, A. T., & Ratter, J. A. (2002). Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the Cerrado biome. In P. S. Oliveira, & R. J. Marquis (Eds.), The Cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a Neotropical savanna (pp. 91–120) New York: Columbia University Press.
Pacheco, R., & Vasconcelos, H. (2012). Habitat diversity enhances ant diversity in a naturally heterogeneous Brazilian landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 797–809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0221-y
Parr, C. L., & Gibb, H. (2010). Competition and the role of dominant ants. In L. Lach, C. L. Parr, & L. Abbott (Eds.), Ant Ecology (pp. 77–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prado-Júnior, J. Á., Maravalhas, J. B., Tosta, T. H. A., Rosa, T. F., Augusto, S. C., & Vasconcelos, H. L. (2020). Spatio-temporal changes in the structure of the ant, bee, and tree communities in the Brazilian cerrado. Oecologia Australis, 24, 448–460. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2020.2402.15
Queiroz, A. C. M., Rabelo, A. M., Braga, D. L., & Ribas, C. (2017). Cerrado vegetation types determine how land use impacts ant biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29, 2017–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1379-8
Queiroz, A. C. M., & Ribas, C. R. (2016). Canopy cover negatively affects arboreal ant species richness in a tropical open habitat. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 76, 864–870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.02015
R Core Team. (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna. http://www.R-project.org
Ramos, L. F., Solar, R. R. C., Santos, H. T., & Fagundes, M. (2019). Variation in community structure of gall-inducing insects associated with a tropical plant supports the hypothesis of competition in stressful habitats. Ecology and Evolution, 9, 13919–13930. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5827
Ribas, C. R., & Schoereder, J. H. (2002). Are all ant mosaics caused by competition? Oecologia, 131, 606–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0912-x
Ribas, C. R., Schoereder, J. H., & Soares, S. M. (2003). Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating ant species richness. Austral Ecology, 28,305–314. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01290.x
Ribbons, R. R. (2014). Community responses to eastern hemlock loss across a latitudinal gradient. Southeastern Naturalist, 13, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1656/058.013.s606
Rosumek, F. B., Silveira, F. A. O., Neves, F. S., Barbosa, N. P. U., Diniz, L. L., Oki, Y. et al. (2009). Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia, 160, 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1309-x
Sant'ana, M. V., Trindade, R. B. R., Santos, C. C. L., Faccenda, O., & Fernandes, W. D. (2008). Atividade de Forrageamento de Formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) em Áreas de Mata e Campo de Gramíneas no Pantanal sul-mato-grossense. EntomoBrasilis, 2, 29–32. https://doi.org/10.12741/ebrasilis.v1i2.11
Schoereder, J. H., Sobrinho, T. G., Ribas, C. R., & Campos, R. B. F. (2004). Colonization and extinction of ant communities in a fragmented landscape. Austral Ecology, 29, 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01378.x
Silva, L. F., Souza, R. M., Solar, R. R., & Neves, F. S. (2017). Ant diversity in Brazilian tropical dry forests across multiple vegetation domains. Environmental Research Letters,12, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5f2a
Souza, J. L. P., & Araújo, J. S. (2020). Evaluation of sampling techniques and influence of environmental variables on ants in forest fragments in an oil extraction area in the Amazon. Sociobiology, 67, 364–375. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v67i3.5148
Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stone, L., & Roberts, A. (1990). The checkerboard score and species distributions. Oecologia, 85, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317345
Thompson, J. N. (1999). The evolution of species interactions. Science, 284, 2116–2118. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5423.2116
Thompson, J. N. (2012). O futuro dos estudos em interações entre plantas-animais. In K. Del-Claro, & H. M. Torezan-Silingardi (Eds.), Ecologia das interações plantas-animais: uma abordagem ecológico evolutiva. Rio de Janeiro: Technical Books, Editora.
Tobin, J. E. (1997). Competition and coexistence of ants in a small patch of rainforest canopy in Peruvian Amazonia. Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 105, 105–112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25010230
Vargas, A. B., Mayhé-Nunes, A. J., Queiroz, J. M., Souza, O., & Ramos, E. F. (2007). Effects of environmental factors on the ant fauna of Restinga community in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology, 36, 28–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2007000100004
