No cuentes los huevos antes de que eclosionen: supervivencia diferencial de nidos artificiales de aves en un paisaje antropogénicamente modificado en el oeste de México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2024.95.5381Palabras clave:
Campos agrícolas, Depredación de nidos de aves, Calidad de hábitat, Jalisco, Huevos de plastilina, Selva seca tropical, UrbanizaciónResumen
La conversión de hábitats nativos en áreas urbanas y campos agrícolas representa problemas de conservación
para la calidad del hábitat y el éxito reproductivo de las aves. La deforestación constante de hábitats en riesgo puede cambiar las comunidades de aves y los depredadores de los nidos, lo que puede influir en su éxito reproductivo. Para evaluar el valor de los hábitats dentro de un paisaje antropogénicamente modificado en el éxito reproductivo de las aves, colocamos 100 nidos artificiales en 5 hábitats con diferentes niveles de actividades humanas, incluyendo una reserva de bosque tropical caducifolio, una estación de investigación biológica, campos agrícolas y 2 pueblos urbanos. Encontramos una clara disminución en la supervivencia de nidos artificiales desde el bosque tropical caducifolio hasta los pueblos urbanos. El tipo de hábitat fue la variable que mejor explicó la variación en las probabilidades de supervivencia de los nidos artificiales en comparación con la altura del nido, la elevación y el tiempo de exposición del nido. Reducir el contraste dentro del paisaje en la estructura de la vegetación entre la reserva y los hábitats dentro del
paisaje modificado representan acciones de conservación importantes para aumentar la calidad del hábitat para las aves.
Citas
Aronson, M. F. J., La Sorte, F. A., Nilon, C. H., Katti, M., Goddard, M. A., Lepczyk, C. A. et al. (2014). A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20133330. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3330
Bayne, E. M., & Hobson, K. A. (1999). Do clay eggs attract predators to artificial nests? Journal of Field Ornithology, 70, 1–7.
Bayne, E. M., Hobson, K. A., & Fargey, P. (1997). Predation on artificial nests in relation to forest type: contrasting the use of quail and plasticine eggs. Ecography, 20, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00366.x
Bocz, R., Szép, D., Witz, D., Ronczyk, L., Kurucz, K., & Purger, J. J. (2017). Human disturbances and predation on artificial ground nests across an urban gradient. Animal Biodiversity Conservation, 40, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2017.40.0153
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Chace, J. F., & Walsh, J. J. (2006). Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74, 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007
Chalfoun, A. D., Thompson, F. R., & Ratnaswamy, M. J. (2002). Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis. Conservation Biology, 16, 306–318.
DeGregorio, B. A., Chiavacci, S. J., Benson, T. J., Sperry, J. H., & Weatherhead, P. J. (2016). Nest predators of North American birds: continental patterns and implications. Bioscience, 66, 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw071
Dinsmore, S. J., & Dinsmore, J. J., 2007. Modeling avian nest survival in program MARK. Studies in Avian Biology, 34, 73–83.
Durán, E., Balvanera, P., Lott, E., Segura, G., Pérez-Jiménez, A., Islas, Á. et al. (2002). Estructura, composición y dinámica de la vegetación. In F. A. Noguera, J. H. Vega-Rivera, A. N. García-Aldrete, & M. Quesada-Avendaño (Eds.), Historia natural de Chamela (pp. 443–472). México D.F.: Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., & Chaudhary, A. (2020). Current and future trends in socio-economic, demographic and governance factors affecting global primate conservation. PeerJ, 8, e9816. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9816
Estrada, A., Rivera, A., & Coates-Estrada, R. (2002). Predation of artificial nests in a fragmented landscape in the tropical region of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biological Conservation, 106, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00246-4
Filloy, J., Zurita, G. A., & Bellocq, M. I. (2019). Bird diversity in urban ecosystems: the role of the biome and land use along urbanization gradients. Ecosystems, 22, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-018-0264-y
Fischer, J. D., Cleeton, S. H., Lyons, T. P., & Miller, J. R. (2012). Urbanization and the predation paradox: the role of trophic dynamics in structuring vertebrate communities. Bioscience, 62, 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.6
Fischer, J. D., Schneider, S. C., Ahlers, A. A., & Miller, J. R. (2015). Categorizing wildlife responses to urbanization and conservation implications of terminology. Conservation Biology, 29, 1246–1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12451
Hurvich, C. M., & Tsai, C. L. (1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76, 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/76.2.297
INEGI (Información Estadística y Geográfica). (2020). Censo de población y vivienda 2020. Recovered on 12 May 2021 from: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2020/
Kehoe, L., Romero-Muñoz, A., Polaina, E., Estes, L., Kreft, H., & Kuemmerle, T. (2017). Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1, 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0234-3
Kurucz, K., Purger, J. J., & Batáry, P. (2021). Urbanization shapes bird communities and nest survival, but not their food quantity. Global Ecology and Evolution, 26, e01475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01475
Latif, Q. S., Heath, S. K., & Rotenberry, J. T. (2012). How avian nest site selection responds to predation risk: testing an ‘adaptive peak hypothesis’. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01895.x
Levey, D. R., Estrada, A., Enríquez, P. L., & Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G. (2021). The importance of forest-nonforest transition zones for avian conservation in a vegetation disturbance gradient in the northern Neotropics. Tropical Conservation Science, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/19400829211008087
Levey, D. R., & MacGregor-Fors, I. (2021). Neotropical bird communities in a human-modified landscape recently affected by two major hurricanes. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 16, art9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01920-160209
Levey, D. R., Patten, M. A., & Estrada, A. (2023). Bird species occupancy trends in southeast Mexico over 1900–2020: accounting for sighting record absences. Journal of Animal Ecology, 92, 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13871
López-Flores, V., MacGregor-Fors, I., & Schondube, J. E. (2009). Artificial nest predation along a Neotropical urban gradient. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.03.001
Maas, B., Karp, D. S., Bumrungsri, S., Darras, K., Gonthier, D., Huang, J. C. C. et al. (2016). Bird and bat predation services in tropical forests and agroforestry landscapes. Biological Reviews, 91, 1081–1101. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/brv.12211
Maass, J. M., Balvanera, P., Castillo, A., Daily, G. C., Mooney, H. A., Ehrlich, P. et al., (2005). Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific coast of Mexico. Ecology and Society, 10, art17.
MacGregor-Fors, I. (2010). How to measure the urban-wildland ecotone: redefining ‘peri-urban’ areas. Ecological Research, 25, 883–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-010-0717-z
MacGregor-Fors, I., García-Arroyo, M., & Quesada, J. (2022). Keys to the city: an integrative conceptual framework on avian urban filtering. Journal of Urban Ecology, 8, juac026. https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juac026
MacGregor-Fors, I., & Schondube, J. E. (2011). Use of tropical dry forests and agricultural areas by Neotropical bird communities. Biotropica, 43, 365–370. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00709.x
MacGregor-Fors, I., Vázquez, L., Vega-Rivera, J. H., & Schondube, J. E. (2009). Non-exotic invasion of Great-tailed Grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus) in a tropical dry forest reserve. Aredea, 97, 367–369. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.097.0312
Martin, T. E. (1993). Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. American Naturalist, 141, 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1086/285515
Martin, T. E. (1995). Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecological Monographs, 65, 101–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937160
Mendoza-Rodríguez, V., Vega-Rivera, J. H., Medina-Montaño, I., & Campos-Cerda, F. (2010). Response of birds in tropical deciduous forest to Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater). The Southwestern Naturalist, 55, 390–393. https://doi.org/10.1894/MH-46.1
Menezes, J. C. T., & Marini, M. Â. (2017). Predators of bird nests in the Neotropics: a review. Journal of Field Ornithology, 88, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12203
Patterson, L., Kalle, R., & Downs, C. (2016). Predation of artificial bird nests in suburban gardens of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Urban Ecosystems, 19, 615–630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0526-4
Pretelli, M. G., Cavalli, M., Chiaradia, N. M., Cardoni, A., & Isacch, J. P. (2023). Location matters: survival of artificial nests is higher in small grassland patches and near the patch edge. Ibis, 165, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13128
Rivera-López, A., & MacGregor-Fors, I. (2016). Urban predation: a case study assessing artificial nest survival in a Neotropical city. Urban Ecosystems, 19, 649–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0523-z
Robinson, W. D., Styrsky, J. N., & Brawn, J. D. (2005). Are artificial bird nests effective surrogates for estimating predation on real bird nests? A test with tropical birds. Auk, 122, 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/122.3.843
Rzedowski, J. (2006). Vegetación de México. Edicion digital. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. México, Ciudad de México. https://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/publicaciones/librosDig/pdf/VegetacionMxPort.pdf
Suazo‐Ortuño, I., Alvarado-Díaz, M., & Martínez-Ramos, M. (2008). Effects of conversion of dry tropical forest to agricultural mosaic on herpetofaunal assemblages. Conservation Biology, 22, 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00883.x
Shochat, E., Lerman, S. B., Anderies, J. M., Warren, P. S., Faeth, S. H., & Nilon, C. H. (2010). Invasion, competition, and biodiversity loss in urban ecosystems. Bioscience, 60, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.6
Tellería, J. L., & Díaz, M. (1995). Avian nest predation in a large natural gap of the Amazonian rainforest. Journal of Field Ornithology, 66, 343–351.
Thorington, K. K., & Bowman, R. (2003). Predation rate on artificial nests increases with human housing density in suburban habitats. Ecography, 26, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03351.x
Vázquez-Reyes, L. D., Arizmendi, M. C., Godínez-Álvarez, O. H., & Navarro-Sigüenza, A. G. (2017). Directional effects of biotic homogenization of bird communities in Mexican seasonal forests. Ornithological Applications, 119, 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-16-116.1
Vazquez, M. S., Zamora-Nasca, L. B., Rodríguez-Cabal, M. A., & Amico, G. C., 2021. Interactive effects of habitat attributes and predator identity explain avian nest predation patterns. Emu - Austral Ornithology, 121, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01584197.2021.1928519
Vega-Rivera, J. H., Medina-Montaño, I., Rappole, J. & Campos-Cerda, F. (2009). Testing the importance of nest concealment: does timing matter? Journal of Field Ornithology, 80, 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2009.00234.x
Vetter, D., Rücker, G., & Storch, I. (2013). A meta-analysis of tropical forest edge effects on bird nest predation risk: edge effects in avian nest predation. Biological Conservation, 159, 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.023
Vincze, E., Seress, G., Lagisz, M., Nakagawa, S., Dingemanse, N. J., & Sprau, P. (2017). Does urbanization affect predation of bird nests? a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00029
White, G. C., & Burnham, K. P. (1999). Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study, 46 (Suppl.), S120–S139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659909477239
Zuñiga-Palacios, J., Corcuera, P., & Almazán-Núñez, R. C. (2021). Living fences decrease the edge effect on nest predation in a tropical dry forest landscape: evidence from an experiment using artificial nests. Agroforestry Systems, 95, 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00603-z
